Search for: "Prison Legal News v. Samuels"
Results 1 - 20
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2022, 4:45 pm
A fair reading of the Unger decision was that all prisoners convicted before 1981 were entitled to new trials. [read post]
Supreme Court rules mandatory sentence based on new crime during supervised release unconstitutional
26 Jun 2019, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
My legal career began in New Zealand, after which I studied in the United States, practiced and taught law in England, and I now teach at a Canadian law school. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am
Davenport, the Supreme Court held on Thursday that a federal court cannot grant habeas relief to a convicted state prisoner whose constitutional rights were violated at trial unless that prisoner satisfies both the judicially-created Brecht v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:07 am
The post Supreme Court rules warrant generally needed to track cell phone location appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:08 am
Justice Samuel A. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
” “In reaching that conclusion, we break no new legal ground,” he says. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
At issue in the new case before the Court — Minneci, et al., v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:57 pm
The justices denied review in Dahne v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Samuel A. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:15 am
Second, Lombardo v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
The post Supreme Court broadens scope of federal post-conviction review appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm
In yesterday’s Janus v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am
New Relist Andrus v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
The Court granted one new case: Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 12:05 pm
That conundrum last reached the Supreme Court in 2012 in Martinez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:34 pm
The question raised in Shinn v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:54 pm
Samuels — legal duty of indigent prison inmate to pay court filing fees Monday, November 9: Montanile v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
Briefly: In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage and Timothy Phelps look at the role that Justice Samuel Alito – whom they describe as “a rising power inside the court and one of its most significant new justices in at least two decades” – could play in several high-profile cases this Term. [read post]
