Search for: "Pritchett v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2008, 12:47 am
Per Lussier v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 8:30 am
Chastain, Jr.The Fifth Circuit recently addressed the issue of copyright ownership in its unreported decision in Pritchett v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 3:09 am
See Amalgamated, 435 F.3d at 1146; Miedema, 450 F.3d at 1326; Pritchett v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:16 pm
Mar. 24, 2005); Pritchett v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., 435 F.3d 1140, 1146 (9th Cir. 2006); Pritchett v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 2:43 am
Essentially, even if the state court complaint doesn't have a copyright claim, the federal court, on the remand motion, will analyze in a two part test (1) whether the work is within the subject matter of copyright and (2) whether the rights granted under state law are equivalent to exclusive rights granted to a copyright owner.Professor Patry's blog (No Pound of Copyright 12/27/2006) brought to my attention a Fifth Circuit case Pritchett v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:28 am
Kidd v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 4:48 am
See Amalgamated, 435 F.3d at 1146; Miedema, 450 F.3d at 1326; Pritchett v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Pritchett Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 2:42 pm
Maytag Corp., 450 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2006); Pritchett v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Perez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Louis Post-Dispatch,July 30, 2006..............................................13, 14, 15Letter from Michael Pritchett, AssistantAttorney General of Missouri, to MichaelGans, Clerk, U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
Pix Credit: The Apotheosis of George Washington; US Capitol Building Washington DCThe 4th day of July has been set aside in our Republic for the celebration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence by the members of the Second Continental Congress at that moment in rebellion against the authority of the King in Parliament of Great Britain and Ireland, whose subjects they then were. [read post]
