Search for: "Processing Research, Inc. v. Larson"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
V. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
Too many companies use process based decisions to conduct technology selection, when they should be focusing on end result goals. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd… [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Haliye v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
The main conclusion reached in the paper is that empirical research can make important contributions to scholarly understanding of investment arbitration. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
On the other hand, empirical research has important limitations in its ability to demonstrate the presen [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In 1921, John Larson incorporated the measurement of respiration rate and by 1939 Leonard Keeler added skin conductance and an amplifier to the parameters examined by a polygraph machine.10. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
