Search for: "Proper v. Proper"
Results 1 - 20
of 32,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 11:59 pm
Practice point: Ordinarily, a process server's affidavit of service establishes a prima facie case as to the method of service and, therefore, gives rise to a presumption of proper service.Student note: However, where there is a sworn denial that a defendant was served with process, the affidavit of service is rebutted, and the plaintiff must establish jurisdiction at a hearing by a preponderance of the evidence.Case: Goralski v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:12 am
” The Court’s recent decision on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act individual health insurance mandate in NFIB v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:53 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
The “necessary and proper” clause of the Constitution explains a lot. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:47 pm
A recent Texas Supreme Court case, Allen-Pieroni v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 6:56 am
It is styled, Albion Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:54 am
Below the radar in yesterday's news coverage was a proper discussion of international case law in a Supreme Court opinion by Justice Kennedy.No, not Graham v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:59 am
Lynn argues that Dodge v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:45 am
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:18 pm
It was not until NFIB v. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 6:08 am
The opinion is styled, Laura Navarro v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 5:51 am
This requirement was the subject of a recent Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi opinion styled, Libardo Taboada, et al v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:57 am
Here is the abstract: Chief Justice John Roberts argued, in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:06 pm
Curb v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:40 pm
In State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
From Marbury v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:30 am
Crews v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:59 pm
The problem is illustrated by the comments provided by two members of the Court, Judges Lourie and O'Malley, in their concurrence and dissent, respectively, with the Court's per curiam denial of en banc review in Athena Diagnostics Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:29 pm
In yesterday’s case (Day v. [read post]
