Search for: "Pross v. Pross" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2009, 9:43 am
Clear violation of nighttime search rule, motion to suppress filed, case nolle prossed, client promptly indicted federally.] [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 3:44 pm by lsammis
Sleet, the State Attorney's Office filed a "Notice of Nolle Prosse" which dropped all charges against client including one count of organized scheme to defraud less than $20,000 and six counts of fraudulent use of credit card. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:53 am by Markus Lenssen
(Cantab.) rospatt osten pross– Intellectual Property Rechtsanwälte More from our authors: Concise European Copyright Law Second Edition by Thomas Dreier, P. [read post]
THE
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am by CAPTAIN
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 1:19 pm by Susan Brenner
   On July 19, 2011, “the case was nol prossed on motion of the district attorney, and Hatfield was a free man. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
 Kat friend Simon Klopschinski, of rospatt osten pross, provides an in-depth analysis of a recent IP related arbitration case in the US, in which trademarks and licenses were sufficient to constitute an “investment” under Article 25 of the ICSID Convention: Bridgestone v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
Several months ago, the arbitral tribunal in the matter of Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:21 am by Leonard
Following, are the specific conditions, outlined in the statutory language, that are associated with an accident surcharge, that if proven true, allow for a challenge and a reimbursement of the surcharge: (I) Lawfully parked; (II) Reimbursed by, or on behalf of, a person responsible for the accident or has a judgment against such person; (III) Struck in the rear by another vehicle headed in the same direction and was not convicted of a moving traffic violation in connection with the accident; (IV)… [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:21 am by Leonard
Following, are the specific conditions, outlined in the statutory language, that are associated with an accident surcharge, that if proven true, allow for a challenge and a reimbursement of the surcharge: (I) Lawfully parked; (II) Reimbursed by, or on behalf of, a person responsible for the accident or has a judgment against such person; (III) Struck in the rear by another vehicle headed in the same direction and was not convicted of a moving traffic violation in connection with the accident; (IV)… [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 2016, the State nolle prossed the charges against suspects. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:27 am by SHG
As the Supreme Court famously said in Berger v. [read post]