Search for: "Protect Our Benefits v. City & Co. of San Francisco"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
City & County of San Francisco (Cal. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
San Francisco Deputy City Attorney Owen Clements presented the public entities' position. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am
The City of San Francisco yanked $3.5 million in social services contracts from the Salvation Army when it refused, for religious reasons, to provide benefits to its employees’ same-sex partners. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ, Respondent. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans,[1] 517 U.S. 620 (1996) (equal protection limitations)· City of EastLake v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Glendening, 709 A.2d 1230 (Md. 1988) and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Exemptions Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
“The president of the Two Chinese Christian Councils of Huangshi city explained to believer [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, involves a Second Amendment challenge to a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal. 4th 203, which interpreted that standard under FEHA as follows: To support a claim for unlawful discrimination or retaliation under FEHA, an employee must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a protected category was a substantial motivating factor in the denial of an employment benefit. (2 C.C.R. 11009(c)). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Our second new relist is Bruce v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
This Newsletter also appears as a post on our website Taber Law Group every Monday. [read post]
