Search for: "Providence Gas Company v. Public Util. Commission"
Results 81 - 100
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
In Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
References within the article to California decisions, while not precedential outside that state, nevertheless provide important examples of the types of workplace violence incidents that commissions and boards find compensable. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Assemblyman V. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am
For starters, when the platform removes the content, then (so long as the user can be located and the content is not part of an ongoing legal investigation) the company must: (a) notify the user and explain the reason for removal; (b) allow the user to appeal the decision; and (c) provide written notice to the user regarding the determination of the user’s appeal. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
FERC; Public Citizen, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
Among other things, House Bill 864 (passed) alters EmPOWER by providing, subject to Public Service Commission approval, electric and gas companies in concert with the Department of Housing and Community Development must redistribute ratepayer collected funds to implement programs and services (.. different from the Program’s current aims of reducing energy consumption and providing assistance to limited income households) to now promote the… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Maine Public Utilities Commission Docket: 08-674 Argument date: November 3, 2009 Question presented: When a third party challenges an agreement between an energy company and a utility over the rate the utility will pay for electricity, should federal law presume that the rate is legal? [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Over the past two years, U.S. public companies faced an unpredictable risk environment. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:20 am
The court held that the third prong in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
We are inclined to agree with Chief Justice Rehnquist’s dissenting opinion in Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
In Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
She has provided post-merger integration assistance and assisted with carve-out and stand-alone issues at the semiconductor equipment division of an international manufacturing company, an oil and natural gas industry services company, and a major automotive parts supplier. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
As the Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Exceptions may apply, including for stock repurchases: occurring in connection with certain non-taxable corporate reorganizations; by regulated investment companies and real estate investment trusts; not exceeding $1 million in aggregate during the taxable year; and to the extent treated as a dividend. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
The judgment in the case of British Gas Trading v McPherson [2020] CSOH 61 was delivered on 13 May 2020. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Scope 2 refers to indirect GHG emissions from the utilities that a company purchases. [read post]
