Search for: "Provident Nat. Bank v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
Specifically, in Huntington Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Wachovia Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Plaintiff also relies on United States v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Just as bonds, which are less volatile than equities, historically provide lower returns than stocks, so may companies with less-volatile stock prices provide lower returns than companies with the potential to be rocked by controversy.[38] The trade-off between risk and return is nothing more than Finance 101. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
Mining & Minerals Div. of the Energy, Minerals & Nat. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Although the Fifth Circuit ostensibly looks to state-law for guidance in limitations cases, it refused to do so with respect to an important safety net Texas provides. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Nat’l Austl. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Nat’l Austl. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
See, e.g., Franklin Nat. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:25 am
Cody, 127 So. 3d 753, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that the order construing a will to determine beneficiaries was premature as “the probate court has not actually admitted the will to probate”); First Nat’l Bank of Miami v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
AO Alfa-Bank v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
. and provides no explanation for why it could not do the same for California residents. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Nat’l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 276 (2010) (Stevens, [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
