Search for: "Provident Nat. Bank v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2017, 9:43 am by Beth Graham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has affirmed a district court’s order denying a motion to compel arbitration that was filed by a group of former Ponzi scheme employees. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
And the credit card account at issue in Madden was presumably one of those, because the 2d Circuit opinion in Madden v Midland mentions a notice-of-change-in-terms that changed the choice-of-law state to Delaware, FIA's home state.Exemplar of Bank of America N.A. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
United States Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 479 F.3d 994, 999 (9th Cir. 2007) stated that it is “plaintiff’s prerogative, subject to the good faith requirement, to forgo a potentially larger recovery to remain in state court. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:19 am by Kyle Fleming
City Nat’l Bank, 607 F.2d 824, 827 (9th Cir. 1979). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:15 pm
Bank Ltd. three Australian investors (“Plaintiffs”) sued National Australia Bank, and its wholly owned United States based subsidiary, HomeSide, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:56 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
The United States Supreme Court reversed the lower courts, holding that a borrower exercising his right to rescind under the Act need only provide written notice to his lender within the three-year period, not file suit within that period. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:07 am by Juan Antunez
Bank United provided the Riches with account agreements containing the option of a tenancy by the entireties, but that option was not selected. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 10:14 am by Dennis Crouch
However, that case was vacated as moot by the Supreme Court in PNC Bank Nat. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]