Search for: "Provident National Bank, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2022, 12:14 pm
— U.S. appeals court rejects disbarred lawyer’s football-related-head-injuries defense to bank fraud. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm
Bank of America N.A., plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class of “individuals of U.S. national origin and/or ancestry, as well as naturalized individuals,” sued Bank of America and other companies. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:41 pm
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted certiorari in Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee Under the Pooling and Service Agreement Related to IMPAC Secured Assets Corp. , Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2 v. [read post]
22 Jun 2005, 11:02 pm
Federal law prohibits national banks from providing a "Suspicious Activity Report" in discovery. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:57 am
The district court found that the term “business of banking” as used in the National Bank Act requires the receipt of deposits as an aspect of such business, and with the OCC’s and DFS’s consent, entered a final judgment in favor of the DFS, enabling the OCC to file an appeal. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:29 am
This week the Supreme Court denied petitions for a writ of certiorari in two banking-related appeals. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 6:19 am
BOKF, National Association that the extended overdraft fees charged by BOKF were not “interest” under the National Bank Act (NBA). [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:56 am
In our view, the key issue on appeal is whether [the plaintiff] was an “officer” of the Bank under Section 24 (Fifth). ... [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
On appeal, the Higher Regional Court, Naumburg, reversed the trial court’s decision, holding that the request to be provided with that information was not legally justified: even though the current account services provided by the Stadtsparkasse had been used to carry out the infringing activity, since it was a bank it was entitled to refuse to give evidence in civil proceedings, whatever Article 8 of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Directive 2004/48… [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
In Nina Olson’s recent report to Congress, the head of National Taxpayer Advocate, addressed challenges and concerns facing US taxpayers when dealing with the IRS. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:35 pm
With this agreement in place, Arab Bank appealed. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:51 am
Old National, as trustee, did not try to stop or stay the trial court's orders to dissolve the trusts, but instead the bank directly appealed the decision. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Midland Funding LLC: Uprooting the National Bank Act’s Power of Preemption“ provides another example. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Midland Funding LLC: Uprooting the National Bank Act’s Power of Preemption“ provides another example. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
La Salle Bank National Association (4D10-998), the Fourth District dismissed the appeal as untimely filed based upon the date stamp affixed to the notice of appeal by the trial court's clerk of court. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 10:45 am
It over-turns the decisions of the High Court and the Court of Appeal and finds unanimously for the Banks. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 8:20 am
National Prearranged Services is back in the news after a trial court issued a new $102 million judgment against PNC Bank (the corporate successor of Allegiant Bank). [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:17 am
In a text that will appeal to general readers and legal specialists alike, Natalie Lichtenstein examines the Bank's mandate, investment operations, finance, governance, and institutional set up, as well as providing detailed analyses of the similarities and differences it has with other development banks - charting AIIB's story so far and anticipating its future. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:17 am
Chase Card Funding, LLC have filed appeals with the Second Circuit from the decisions of two New York federal district courts that held the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts their claims that the interest charged on credit card receivables assigned to affiliated securitization trusts violated New York usury law. [read post]
