Search for: "Provost v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
They did so where the recount included some votes in the state and excluded others, a circumstance hardly likely to recur.Moreover, had there been an objection to the Florida electors presented to Congress, Bush v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]
The 27 elite attorneys included Phil Lacovara, former Watergate Prosecutor and the United States’ winning Supreme Court advocate in United States v Nixon.In a comprehensive, carefully researched “bill of particulars,” the 37-page ethics complaint lays out a 16-month pattern and practice of “conduct unbecoming a member of the bar” during Barr’s tenure under President Donald Trump. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is Associate Provost, Associate Dean of the Faculty and William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Austin Sarat is Associate Provost, Associate Dean of the Faculty and William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Instead, 1968 marked the first year of an unofficial moratorium on executions in the lead-up to the Supreme Court’s 1972 Furman v Georgia decision. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Rather, her tenure reviewers simply were not convinced that the professor was showing promise as a scholar who would develop into a leading contributor in her field (Theidon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
He served as dean of the law school from 1987-1994 and provost of the University of Chicago from 1994-2002. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
  The DOJ intervened in the recent FTC v Qualcomm case (in which Judge Koh found in favour of the FTC) and now on appeal. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
In an essay for Notice and Comment, Professor Zachary Price of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law cautioned that a Trump Administration loss in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]