Search for: "Public Citizen, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, Appellant"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
OHIO, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A247 v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
Three California state courts enforced federal forum provisions for Delaware companies in Wong v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
TAKINGS Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Not surprising, the long standing policies of laws to protect their citizens from harms need to adapt to provide remedies commensurate with the gravity and risks of multi-jurisdictional online illegal conduct. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Kern County Board of Supervisors, et al. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The cases are Coalition for Responsible Regulation Inc., et al. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
County of Madera and Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Amicus brief of Institute for Justice Motion of Federal Election Commission to dismiss or affirm Hart v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/cqz Father M, et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Brief in opposition of respondents California Pharmacists Association et al. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:03 pm
Their application (09A1133) in McComish, et al., v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Moreover, they often capitulate to requests to classify information as trade secret, confidential and therefore unavailable to the public. [read post]
