Search for: "Public Citizen Health v. Dept. of Health"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 7:03 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Public Health Laurie Beyranevand, Vermont Law School, Can Revised Standards of Identify Achieve Greater Public Health Outcomes? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:55 pm
State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act, placement)Citizens for Balanced Use v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Every day, COVID–19 poses grave dangers to the citizens of this country—and particularly, to its workers. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 3:34 pm
Public, would be providing the primary funding. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
Shepherd v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
Citizens Ins. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
As Justice Holmes stated in Crowley v Pulsifer (137 Mass 392 [1884]): It is desirable that the trial of cases should take place under public eye, not because the controversies of one citizen are of public concern, but because it is of the highest moment that those who administer [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097ADEASee issue description at Public CitizenSCOTUS docket hereLewis, et al. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
(Citing Citizens for a Green San Mateo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 11:31 pm
Carolina Dept. of Disabilities & Special Needs v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
For publication opinions today (4): In Matthew Zachary v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:46 am
Health Mgt. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
(See McCollum v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:23 pm
The case is Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:12 pm
Dept. of Soc. [read post]
