Search for: "Public Citizen v. US Trade Representative"
Results 1 - 20
of 522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm
By denying the public access to these negotiations, the US has created a fundamental barrier to the development of democracy. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
FlynnIn the recent case of United States v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Bankshares v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See Chiarella v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:34 am
In the light of Supreme Court judgment in Hardie Trading Ltd. and Anr. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
Flynn In the recent case of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
McDonnell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
Trade Representative's (USTR) Trade Advisory Committees, or their equivalent advisory processes in other countries (we wrote more about this for last year's Copyright Week). [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
The Court, in Omar v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Not only do corporations secretly funnel money for political purposes into these trade associations, they too often use them to oppose the very policies their public statements endorse. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
This case arose when CompTel, a trade industry group that represents some of AT&T’s competitors, filed a FOIA request for FCC records relating to that agency’s investigation of AT&T. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
Representatives (including 78 Democrats, although my count here may not be exact). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1964 in Massiah v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1964 in Massiah v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:09 pm
Brian Wolfman, director of Public Citizen Litigation Group in Washington, says the ruling "reaffirms that preemption is the exception and not the rule". [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:21 pm
Six years after Chiarella v. [read post]