Search for: "Public Interest Research Group v. Rice" Results 41 - 60 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On the same days, Collins Rice J heard the trial in the case of LCG v OVD QB-2022-000921. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
The purpose of section 137.1 is to reduce the risk that participation by the public in debates on matters of public interest will be hampered by fear of legal action [56]. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The ALPHV, or BlackCat, group claimed it obtained 7 terabytes of internal documents belonging to London hospitals. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Despite the availability of the public interest defence, the article suggests that publishers face a high risk when reporting on police investigations where the suspect has not been charged, especially when the allegations are not already widely known. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 13 April, Collins Rice J handed down judgment on meaning in the defamation case of Mehmood (Butt) v Dunya News Ltd [2022] EWHC 905 (QB). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Africa A Kenyan constitutional rights group and two Ethiopian researchers have filed a suit in a Nairobi High Court against Meta for their failure to effectively moderate Facebook’s content during Ethiopia’s civil war. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
Lee J held that the although the publisher believed publication of the matter was in the public interest, the belief was not reasonable in the circumstances [384]. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The blue tick is currently offered to users “of public interest” at no charge as a mark of their notability and authenticity. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 31 October 2023 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Webster v HMRC. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Hacked Off has published an explanation of how Russia Today would benefit from the press exemptions of the Online Safety Bill, which are described as “unjustified, poorly drafted, and a threat to the interests and the safety of the British public. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
On 28 November 2022, Collins Rice J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Garnett & Others [2022] EWHC 3017 (KB). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The honest opinion and public interest defences failed because Ms Murray failed to prove the truth of her foundation of the opinion, or her reasonable belief that publication of her was in the public interest. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
This would violate the Public Records Act 1958, which requires such communications to be kept in case they are needed in the public interest Newspaper Journalism and Regulation Hacked Off has criticised IPSO for taking nine months to reach a decision on a simple and highly distressing breach of the Editors’ Code protections for children. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
The comparison group included those who subsequently decided against attending the program (e.g., lived too far away, incarcerated, no longer interested). [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The NME reports that there are three documentaries being made about the Depp v News Group Newspapers trial. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a hearing in COS v PER and another before Collins Rice J. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
The ICO found that the Trust had correctly applied the provision and that maintaining the s24 exemption would be in the public interest. [read post]