Search for: "Public Serv. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm." Results 61 - 80 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am by MOTP
Shamoun, however, the Law Firm would not be precluded from pursuing a quantum meruit claim, albeit of lesser value, even if the contingent fee provisions are null and void as against public policy. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm
"), overruled on other grounds by Festo Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If social media are "the modern public square,"[127] the law may constitutionally treat them (at least as to certain of their functions) the way physical public squares can be treated.[128] The New Jersey Supreme Court's rationale for adopting a public access rule much like the one the California Supreme Court adopted in PruneYard seems largely apt here: The private [shopping mall] property owners in this case … have intentionally transformed their… [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
§ 107, sanctions the unauthorized use of quotations from a public figure’s unpublished manuscript. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
In Hanson v Mecosta Co Road Comm, 465 Mich 492 (2002) the Taylor Court similarly holds that the state has no liability for the defective design of a public highway. 25. [read post]