Search for: "Public Service, Etc. v. Public Util., Etc." Results 101 - 120 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 9:00 pm by Michael W. Dowdle
In the narrow sense, XNCJS means nothing more than our government departments’ daily work, such as the construction and maintenance of retaining dams, the provision of sanitary services, etc. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Harbor Drive, San Diego, California, Terminal 2, Curbside Entrance V Phone number: (619) 491-2680 Hours of Operation: Monday through Friday 12 PM-3 PM Applicants must provide: Original passport plus copy of biodata page Page with ESTA entry stamp I-94 record Copy of initial travel itinerary Proof of cancelled flight Proof of residency outside the US (e.g., lease, utility bill, pay statement, etc.) [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 1:41 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The US military utilizes similar technology developed by Boeing and it's also used extensively by American intelligence services. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
It contains, among other things, articles on (i) the US Supreme Court’s damages analysis in Lucent v Microsoft from an economist’s perspective which proposes new guidelines for evaluating patent damages in concentrated, high tech industries and (ii) the evolution of quilts from utility items to works of art proposing strong copyright law protection for quilt designs. [read post]
AB 1595 would have required public and private mass transportation providers (bus, train, light rail, etc.) to provide human-trafficking training to their employees who are likely to interact with victims of human trafficking. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:50 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  In the end, the City rejected the mixed use alternative as infeasible because it would have greater environmental impacts than the proposed project with respect to services and utilities. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
But what about the disrupting public services/criminal damaging charges? [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 am by Mark Methenitis
In 2005, the Supreme Court considered inducement liability for copyright infringement in MGM v Grokster. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:16 pm by Richard Frank
Supreme Court’s controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:51 am
In a perfectly transparent market all relevant information about a market transaction from the price, order size, order flow, trading volume, identity of the traders/counterparties, all bids and offers available, etc. would theoretically be discoverable. [read post]