Search for: "Purcell v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 8:10 pm
Citing the court’s 2006 decision in Purcell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:33 pm
That is a principle the Court appeared to establish in a late October 2006 decision, Purcell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Purcell, Jr. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am
Purcell v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
It relied heavily on Purcell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 4:33 pm
In Little v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am
In Purcell v Ireland, the Commission (in an admissibility decision) upheld a reporting ban on Sinn Fein accepting – as with the majority in Holder - apparently somewhat speculative justifications for the ban. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 5:31 am
District Judge Algenon Marbley issued this temporary restraining order yesterday in Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:04 pm
That would set the stage for targeted post-election litigation over ballot-counting procedures – essentially a reprise of Bush v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm
" His opinion in Democratic National Committee v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm
" His opinion in Democratic National Committee v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:42 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am
However, the plaintiffs’ contention “rests on speculation as to how [the hospital] would have responded to these [steps]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
The Eighth Circuit Historical Society has an online video commemorating Gideon v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
While dozens of cases are still pending and new cases are being filed every week, the Purcell v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 3:32 pm
On the timing issue, it cited the Supreme Court decision in Purcell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:00 pm
The Louisiana dispute, Ardoin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Ever since Bush v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
