Search for: "Pure Precision Limited" Results 41 - 60 of 1,205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
This post is part of a series on cultural defenses generally, not limited to incest. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am by Kristy Parker
While the mandate document itself is purely ministerial, the timing of when the appellate court issues the mandate is anything but. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Second, however, only federal exclusivity could effectively limit the power of the states to grant unwarranted exclusive rights to favored grantees. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
On page 16, Judge Joanne Royce's dissent explains this precise point: Congress adopted SOX against a backdrop of corporate misconduct conducted on a global arena and was well aware that sustaining market integrity would require more than a purely domestic focus. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
Instead, the issue here is a narrow one: whether the First Amendment protects the precise legal advice that Plaintiffs seek to provide, in the precise setting in which they intend to provide it. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 6:29 am by Jack Goldsmith
  There is a large difference between (i) a limited authorization for the use of force, which gives Congress’s imprimatur and constitutional support to force only for a precise time period or precise purposes, and not beyond, and (ii) a ban on presidential uses of force. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 5:13 pm by Jordan Gold
Nothing in this article is meant to in any way constitute legal advice; it is purely informational. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For example, the statute of limitations defense put Miller on fair notice by identifying some of the applicable statutes of limitations and explaining that the class period is longer than the limitations periods that may apply to absent class members, and also that the precise limitations period depends on a choice of law analysis. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:21 am by Howard Wasserman
Fitzgerald, in which the Court adopted a purely objective  standard for qualified immunity in § 1983/Bivens actions precisely because it would allow more claims to be resolved at summary judgment. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Da Silva testified that “this was because some local bars at the time were building teams purely to win, for self-promotion, and they did not care about the spirit of NAGAAA or the Gay Softball World Series. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:56 am
I'm thinking the identification as male is something deep-seated and not purely a choice. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:56 am by Ryan Calo
  Is pure facilitation, in the sense of being free from manipulation, even possible? [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:56 am by Ryan Calo
  Is pure facilitation, in the sense of being free from manipulation, even possible? [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:19 pm by Ilyse Schuman
” The Court averred that its string of decisions on the FAA’s applicability “forecloses precisely” this type of “judicial hostility towards arbitration. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 9:30 am by Clara Spera
To limit the detainees’ access to sending mail would be to limit their opportunity to build that kind of potential defense to the death penalty. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:05 pm by Lee E. Berlik
This is where it becomes necessary to examine the precise context in which the statement was made. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
That sounds quite a bit like the speech Citron is talking about when she says that revenge porn bans should be limited to private communications between people in a trusting relationship. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am by The Book Review Editor
 It requires difficult tradeoffs among multiple social goods, starting with security and liberty; this is the premise of Lawfare, but it takes by assumption that neither pure security concerns nor pure rights concerns ought to govern, absolutely and alone, a liberal democratic society. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 2:56 pm
"  The court also invited the USPTO to require patent applicants to clarify the scope of functional limitations, stating:When a claim limitation is defined in purely functional terms, the task of determining whether that limitation is sufficiently definite is a difficult one that is highly dependent on context (e.g., the disclosure in the specification and the knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in the relevant art area). [read post]