Search for: "QUALITY CONTROL INTERNATIONAL v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
However, the quest to control the resale after the first sale, to control the channels of distribution and the pricing of the imported copies of these products into the USA, and to generally assert a right to control sale after “first sale” and to take advantage of higher American “what will the market bear” pricing was denied. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
However, the quest to control the resale after the first sale, to control the channels of distribution and the pricing of the imported copies of these products into the USA, and to generally assert a right to control sale after “first sale” and to take advantage of higher American “what will the market bear” pricing was denied. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm by JP Zanders
Russia’s campaign accusing Ukraine and the USA of running biological weapon (BW) activities in violation of the BTWC became more forceful in the months before it invaded Ukraine and an international issue afterwards. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
I was gambling in Havana; I took a little risk: Pernod Ricard USA LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:12 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court’s per curiam order in Allaithi v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:25 am
This is not, after all, a case like Church of Scientology International v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm by Unknown
 "Obstetric Fistula-induced Incontinence and WASH Programming in Humanitarian Settings: Agenda for Research, Innovation, and Practice," Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 8:1 (Jan. 2023)- Authors (4) = Ghana- APC = USD 790"The Politics of Statelessness, Refugeehood and Humanitarianism of the Rohingyas," Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 11 Jan. 2023- Authors (2) = India- APC = USD 1260"La Portée du Principe du Non-refoulement en Droit… [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
The first allegation was that on 1 September 2007, at Pitsea Market, Basildon, in the County of Essex, he did, with a view to gain for himself or another, without the consent of the proprietor, have in his custody or control in the course of a business certain goods, namely 392 pairs of trainers bearing the Nike sign or logo, such sign or logo being likely to be mistaken for the registered trade mark of Nike International Limited of Oregon, USA, contrary to section… [read post]