Search for: "Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Florian Mueller
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:07 pm by Florian Mueller
But even if German courts including Germany-based UPC Local Divisions became unattractive venues for enforcement, SEP holders could sue elsewhere (the regulation would not result in a global license or a global portfolio valuation--only the EU parts would be affected).An interesting if not intriguing effect of the Reciprocal FRAND Agreement proposed by Qualcomm would be that FRAND would become a matter of contract rather than antitrust law. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am by Florian Mueller
Second, net licensors would have to place greater emphasis in litigation and in licensing negotiations on their non-SEPs. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:56 pm by Florian Mueller
Yesterday (Friday), Qualcomm filed its motion for summary judgment: In Re Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:17-md-2773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm by Florian Mueller
Here's the joint case management statement the parties just filed to state their divergent positions:In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:17-md-2773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Presumably no one will object (though the notice says it would have "no effect on [a party's] case whatsoever").A week earlier (March 16), the parties will have to file a case management statement in preparation of the hearing.Judge Corley granted in part a motion to dismiss another antitrust case piggybacking on an FTC action--a class action against Qualcomm--on Friday. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission's antitrust litigation against Qualcomm came to a definitive end almost two years ago when the FTC refrained from seeking Supreme Court review of the first-class acquittal the San Diego chipmaker had won in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 9:48 am by Florian Mueller
What makes sense for Qualcomm to do--and I'm not taking a position here on whether it raises antitrust concerns--is unique to that company with its particular business model and competitive strategy. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:46 am by luiza
The most high profile were between Apple and Samsung Electronics, and Apple versus Qualcomm which the companies eventually settled among themselves. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:35 pm by Florian Mueller
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap -- December 5, 2022I'd have liked to follow the trial in one of the world's most important patent litigation venues, but due to other obligations and plans I couldn't make it. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:32 pm by Florian Mueller
On April 16, 2019, I was in the overflow room of the San Diego courthouse of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California when Apple and Qualcomm--with opening arguments still ongoing--announced the settlement of their global antitrust and patent dispute. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 10:08 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple just uses its vast resources to make all sorts of arguments that no reasonable litigation would give a try.I could see a few years ago why Apple raised a complex antitrust question about Qualcomm's market power in chipsets in a case in which Qualcomm was specifically targeting iPhones with Intel chips--its only competitor at the time. [read post]