Search for: "Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 41 - 60
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
., Epic, which was already embroiled with Google and Apple in app store antitrust litigation) is the reason for which it now, all of a sudden, needs emergency relief from the court: "You can’t waiver for eight months and come in and say the house is on fire. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:35 pm
Whether in a policy context like the IEEE's standard-essential patent (SEP) policy or in litigation, I often find that Apple will say anything that it believes may advance its agenda--or will even have astroturfers say it. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
A court’s inherent authority to impose sanctions serves goals beyond the specific litigation at hand. [read post]
12 May 2022, 1:37 am
With Apple's annual litigation budget in the billions of dollars, that may be workable. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:37 am
"To the best of my knowledge, no infringement litigation by any of Avanci's licensors--four dozen SEP holders including some of the largest ones such as Ericsson, Qualcomm, and LG--was pending, so this agreement resulted only from negotiations. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 1:45 am
Case in point, Thales--which is pursuing its own ill-conceived case against Avanci (in Munich)--points in its amicus brief to its litigation with Philips, which is an Avanci licensor. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:41 pm
Qualcomm and Apple v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:22 am
Qualcomm hearing two years ago that the house of cards (based on which Qualcomm was held liable for antitrust violations, and enjoined) began to fall. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
They chose a negotiated agreement over potentially protracted litigation. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
Qualcomm, the Fifth Circuit has effectively determined that SEP holders are free to choose the licensing model that best suits them, and others can't impose their preferences on them. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
’[1] For example, it is impractical for royalty rates to be negotiated ex-ante to standardization, and it rarely occurs because neither licensors nor licensees seek that in practice, and it would cause antitrust concerns if it was required in standards development. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:08 am
Then Google and Qualcomm are not only way bigger but also a lot more sophisticated than Epic when it comes to high-stakes litigation. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
Qualcomm, and Judge Ryan D. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 1:27 am
Then, they also brought an "antitrust case" against licensing firm IPCom that is probably the greatest lunacy I've ever seen in patent litigation and was exposed as totally meritless by the Mannheim Regional Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
Apple's intentions in some regards do matter in an antitrust context, and maybe the judge could or even should have given them more weight. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
If you're a Qualcomm or an Ericsson, why would you not want to get paid if Nokia does? [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm
By contrast, antitrust issues had actually been raised by Deutsche Telekom in its multi-year litigation with IPCom, but when Deutsche Telekom--not under duress but purely for the convenience of its then-outgoing CEO--wanted to settle, IPCom negotiated a Section 8.2 of the 2013 agreement that Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:33 am
The circuit court, among other findings, held that Qualcomm had no antitrust duty to license its SEPs to competitors. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:14 am
Qualcomm judgment was in part based on a reasoning that appeared to generally raise the bar for antitrust theories targeting patent licensing and litigation practices. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
”4 In fact, Judge Koh observed that “Qualcomm had received licenses ‘to manufacture and sell components,’” “Qualcomm received ‘exhaustive licenses’ from ‘[o]ver 120 companies,’” and “Qualcomm has emphasized in prior litigation that a SEP holder may not discriminate in licensing its SEPs. [read post]
