Search for: "Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 61 - 80
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
But in Europe, SEP case law is antitrust-, not contract-based, and Apple made the same arguments there (and it also brought antitrust claims in the U.S. over SEPs, such as against Samsung, though in vain, and against Qualcomm, though the San Diego Apple v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:03 am
I found that major licensors Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, InterDigital, Nokia and Qualcomm accounted for most royalties paid, even with conservatively high estimates for other licensors. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:03 am
I found that major licensors Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, InterDigital, Nokia and Qualcomm accounted for most royalties paid, even with conservatively high estimates for other licensors. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 7:29 am
After more than two years of litigation between Nokia and Daimler, the outcome was a car-level license. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 10:53 am
The third and final part will then focus on antitrust [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:08 am
The Federal Trade Commission and Apple had a Common Interest Agreement in place against Qualcomm, to give just one example. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:19 am
Antitrust law can do that.The FTC's motion for rehearing en banc against the Qualcomm panel decision failed. [read post]
5 May 2021, 7:06 am
In April, regulators called in 33 firms to discuss anti-competitive practices; they were instructed to come into full compliance with existing antitrust law by May 13. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
After this post, I'll (have to) take a break from blogging about App Store antitrust matters for a few weeks or maybe even months, as I'll explain further below. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:57 am
Qualcomm, Intel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit finds that Apple’s patent licensing agreement with Qualcomm eliminated standing to appeal IPRs from the PTAB; the Second Circuit hears oral arguments in copyright lawyer Richard Liebowitz’s sanctions appeal as well as an appeal of antitrust claims against Takeda over improper extensions of FDA exclusivity for Actos; the Supreme Court rules that Google’s copying of Oracle’s Java API was fair use;… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 5:14 am
Qualcomm, Intel v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:24 am
Qualcomm doesn't immunize patent-related practices from antitrust liability to the far-reaching extent that some would have us all believe.Even if--in a totally hypothetical but conceivable scenario--all that Apple and Intel achieved in the Fortress case was a trend reversal from FTC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
I'm not worried about Qualcomm or other major SEP holders laying off talented engineers anytime soon.Bird & Bird partner Richard Vary, formerly Nokia's litigation chief and now its outside counsel in connection with automotive SEP licensing matters, equated the concept of patent exhaustion with a "windfall" for downstream members of a supply chain. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
Qualcomm--will indicate how many trial days are needed. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
Automotive supplier Continental brought FRAND litigation against the Avanci pool and several of its contributors, particularly Nokia, in 2019. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:41 pm
Throughout this year, there's going to be news from numerous countries on multiple continents concerning app store antitrust matters. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
And while Ericsson--typically alongside Nokia and Qualcomm--supports SEP abuse as a member of the Avanci gang and various lobby groups, Samsung has filed amicus briefs and made other pro-FRAND statements in recent years. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 12:40 am
UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION: Given that SEP holder and implementer have to meet certain obligations (infringement notice, request for license, FRAND licensing offer; licensing offer to a supplier) prior to litigation, is it still possible to make up, without prejudice, for obligations not previously met while litigation is pending? [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 3:01 am
Simultaneously, Apple is pressing antitrust charges--through private litigation--particularly in connection with abusive patent-leveraging practices. [read post]
