Search for: "Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 81 - 100
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 10:18 am
In Qualcomm's opinion, "an arbitration requirement should not be made a routine component of [antitrust] remedies". [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:25 am
Pender recommended that the U.S. trade agency refrain from banning Intel-powered iPhones he deemed to infringe a Qualcomm patent, given Qualcomm's overtly anticompetitive litigation tactics of targeting only Intel-powered iPhones. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:56 pm
Even though Qualcomm's present litigation costs are huge, as are PR expenditures that according to the New York Times even included a fake "Draft Tim Cook 2020" website, that's still a lot. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:35 am
Qualcomm tried hard, but unsuccessfully, to get the FTC's antitrust lawsuit in the Northern District of California dismissed. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 8:51 pm
Almost two years have passed, but Qualcomm has yet to prove two thirds of its enterprise value (that's what the company's patent licensing business accounts for as was stated repeatedly during last month's FTC antitrust trial) in litigation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am
As for the DOJ's Antitrust Division, even Wikipedia mentions that Mr. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am
Qualcomm: Count XXIII of Apple's antitrust complaint against Qualcomm is a request for judicial "declaration of unenforceability [of Qualcomm's patents in certain contexts] due to exhaustion. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:57 am
"Judge Lucy Koh has just set a schedule for that antitrust litigation, and it's a reasonably ambitious one. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:24 am
Bornstein and Even were also listed among Qualcomm's counsel in the Apple antitrust litigation in San Diego, but that case settled during opening arguments, so Cravath chairman Evan Chesler was the only attorney to argue on Qualcomm's behalf before the trial was already over.Epic Games relies on the same team of lawyers in a parallel case against Google in the same district, which may very well get consolidated into the Apple litigation.Follow… [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:17 pm
Qualcomm antitrust and contract litigation in the Southern District of California. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial kicked off in the federal courthouse in San Jose (Northern District of California). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:04 am
Qualcomm, 501 F.3d 297 (3d Cir. 2007). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial in San Jose (Northern District of California), which will continue in Judge Lucy H. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:08 am
It will keep trying, but realistically it won't be able to force Apple into a settlement before some key antitrust, contract and patent exhaustion questions are resolved in the United States.I will soon write in a separate post about Munich as a patent litigation venue. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:59 am
The court also reasoned that Motorola did not violate antitrust law by bringing a patent infringement action against Apple because Motorola has a First Amendment right to petition the courts for relief and the litigation was not objectively baseless. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 11:47 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial before Judge Lucy H. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
There's a lesson for life that Qualcomm may have learned in recent weeks as an unintended side effect of its dispute with Apple: if smart judges figure out whom they can trust, the facts are not for sale.Qualcomm's patent litigation campaign against Apple (and, by extension, chipset maker Intel) has suffered a few setbacks already. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:07 pm
But even if German courts including Germany-based UPC Local Divisions became unattractive venues for enforcement, SEP holders could sue elsewhere (the regulation would not result in a global license or a global portfolio valuation--only the EU parts would be affected).An interesting if not intriguing effect of the Reciprocal FRAND Agreement proposed by Qualcomm would be that FRAND would become a matter of contract rather than antitrust law. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:53 am
Qualcomm is seeking leverage over Apple in order to get rid of the antitrust and contract law challenges pending in the Southern District of California and foreign jurisdictions, and in order to force Apple to drop Intel as a baseband chipset supplier. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:28 am
The DOJ would have to sue the IEEE, and the previous Business Review Letter would have complicated any litigation. [read post]
