Search for: "Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 81 - 100
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2020, 6:35 am
"The Federal Court of Justice of Germany has an antitrust panel whose presiding judge is a longstanding patent extremist, and its Sisvel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
Qualcomm Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 12:30 am
Grosch), was highly persuasive, even though I've more frequently seen him argue just the other way on behalf of plaintiffs like Qualcomm. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
Apple litigation and presumably close to finalizing her decision on Epic's motion for a preliminary injunction, is a Democrat (according to Wikipedia). [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:47 am
In alphabetical order:Avanci: Sharp, just like Nokia, Ericsson, Qualcomm and many others, is a member of the abusive Avanci gang. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:37 am
Even in Friday's motion, Epic makes an unequivocal admission:"Epic does not prevail on its antitrust claims, then Epic would be liable for breach. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:33 am
Qualcomm, the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has recently rejected all antitrust-based claims including exclusive dealing: “Qualcomm is under no antitrust duty to license rival chip suppliers. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:57 am
Potentially Epic's lawyers, some of whom previously represented Qualcomm against Apple (and the Federal Trade Commission), believe Apple said something in the dispute with Qualcomm that runs counter to what it's saying now when defending itself against Epic.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:24 am
Qualcomm when she was trying to devalue Qualcomm's portfolio.The "methodology" of that "study" is vaguely described as applying Justice Birss's Unwired Planet v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
With respect to the component-level licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs), the Federal Trade Commission's petition for a Ninth Circuit rehearing en banc of the Qualcomm case is not going to make a difference either way, given that the FTC's theory is not an actual antitrust duty to deal but just an allegation of a violation that would (should the court agree) consist of a breach of contract. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:11 pm
Earlier this year I explained why I tend to agree with Qualcomm that it's inapposite. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:22 pm
But Munich is a hotbed for patent--and increasingly also for SEP--litigation. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 11:11 am
Fortress litigation and the upcoming Softbank-ARM merger reviews are also worth keeping an eye on. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:06 am
The 2015 IEEE patent policy change, endorsed by a BRL from the previous DoJ antitrust head, is dangerously serving as a template for antitrust enforcers worldwide – not only with respect to IEEE standards, but also for other standards such as 3GPP’s mobile communications standards. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:28 am
The DOJ would have to sue the IEEE, and the previous Business Review Letter would have complicated any litigation. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
Qualcomm Inc., reversing the district court’s judgment in favor of the FTC. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:20 am
Qualcomm (9th Cir., Aug. 11, 2020), just a fortnight earlier. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 am
Daimler, but it shows that territorial overreach is a cross-jurisdictional problem.But with all that's been disappointing lately on the SEP litigation front, there's a silver lining, too: Next week the Dusseldorf Regional Court will finally hear Huawei's antitrust action seeking to obligate Nokia to make an offer for an exhaustive component-level license on FRAND terms. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:24 am
The way Epic Games started this leaves no doubt they're at least as PR-focused as Qualcomm and Nokia combined. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:17 pm
Qualcomm antitrust and contract litigation in the Southern District of California. [read post]
