Search for: "Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 121 - 140
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
So important to the litigation process, so fraught with the potential disaster. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:38 pm
The court also found that Broadcom failed to allege a sufficient antitrust injury to support its bid to force Qualcomm to divest its recent acquisition of Flarion, a leading developer of technology for next-generation cell phones.The litigation is based on the core electronics used in cellular telephones. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
With respect to the component-level licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs), the Federal Trade Commission's petition for a Ninth Circuit rehearing en banc of the Qualcomm case is not going to make a difference either way, given that the FTC's theory is not an actual antitrust duty to deal but just an allegation of a violation that would (should the court agree) consist of a breach of contract. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
Nevertheless, the antitrust laws do impose some limits on a patent holder’s rights, and as a result patent licensing and litigation have become significant competitive issues in the technology industry in recent years. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:43 am
Jan. 11, 2019.The Apple-Intel brief doesn't even mention the DOJ's interventions on Qualcomm's behalf, but Qualcomm is not a troll. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
Brewster ordered Qualcomm to pay all Broadcom's litigation fees -- which the vice president of intellectual property litigation for Broadcom said could be about $10 million -- and also disqualified two of Qualcomm's patents. [read post]
The patent defendant's dilemma in Munich: damned if you do, damned if you don't give up your secrets
23 Dec 2018, 9:59 pm
Zigann explained that German civil litigation is centered around the parties' proffers of evidence as opposed to U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
Pa.), the plaintiff sued Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), a standard-setting body that establishes global standards for mobile communications technologies, and three of its corporate members, LM Ericsson Telephone Company, Qualcomm, Inc. and Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:23 am
Qualcomm antitrust ruling came down that same week.Of all the cases I've watched since I started this blog nearly a decade ago, what went wrong in this Munich case makes it the worst non-standard-essential patent case by a wide margin, just like the district court's Oracle v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
Automotive supplier Continental brought FRAND litigation against the Avanci pool and several of its contributors, particularly Nokia, in 2019. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:53 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial in the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:33 am
The circuit court, among other findings, held that Qualcomm had no antitrust duty to license its SEPs to competitors. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 am
Governments and legal advisors are struggling to understand the issues and implications these platforms raise, particularly in the areas of intellectual property, privacy, and antitrust law and practice. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:06 am
It reverses a lower court holding that Qualcomm had a legally sanctioned monopoly in its patented technology. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 10:08 pm
Apple just uses its vast resources to make all sorts of arguments that no reasonable litigation would give a try.I could see a few years ago why Apple raised a complex antitrust question about Qualcomm's market power in chipsets in a case in which Qualcomm was specifically targeting iPhones with Intel chips--its only competitor at the time. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:22 pm
But Munich is a hotbed for patent--and increasingly also for SEP--litigation. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:28 am
Qualcomm outcome, too, should dissuade the FCC from taking steps that would invite legal challenges. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:41 pm
Qualcomm and Apple v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:36 pm
This is epitomized in litigation between Apple and Qualcomm, commencing January 2017, until settlement in April 2019 and in the US Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust action against Qualcomm also commencing around the same time and now on appeal. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 6:25 am
The only thing that would help here is regulatory scrutiny and/or private antitrust litigation (which might have to raise an essential facility question, which would not only be hard to prevail on as the concept hasn't been recognized by the Supreme Court but would also be against Google's own interests in other tech law contexts). [read post]
