Search for: "Quality Brands, Inc. v. Barry"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) World Customs Organisation to replace controversial IP standards body; doubts remain (Intellectual Property Watch) Rebalance your IP portfolio for 2009 (IP Spotlight) IAM blog’s IP personalities of 2008 (IAM) Key themes for 2009 – from green patents to the IP marketplace (IAM) Experts examine strategies for IP and sustainable development (Intellectual Property Watch) The paradox of accounting innovation (IP Frontline) Saving your IP (Patent Baristas) … [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Please do not ask to have any links "corrected" because the links are not mistakes, they simply demonstrate that personal branding is as important as corporate branding. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
The fact that COCA COLA and PEPSI may be registered trademarks does not mean the government has endorsed these brands of cola, or prefers them over other brands. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
The fact that COCA COLA and PEPSI may be registered trademarks does not mean the government has endorsed these brands of cola, or prefers them over other brands. [read post]
