Search for: "Quantification Settlement Agreement Cases"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 3:47 pm
Justice Robie publishes an opinion to say: "We love that the parties have finally settled this long-running dispute, which has seen no less than eight different proceedings in the Court of Appeal over the past dozen years. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:07 pm
We hold only that the trial court may not finally approve the settlement agreement until provided with sufficient information to assure itself that the terms of the agreement are indeed fair, adequate and reasonable. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 1:52 pm
The case relates to claims that the provincially operated LCBO and Beer Store entered into an agreement to allocate the types of beer products sold (allegedly for the LCBO to only sell six-packs with the Beer Store retailing larger cases). [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Specifically, they were determined by collective agreement; they set a minimum price floor for the MSC; the non-negotiable MIF element of the MSC was set by collective agreement rather than competition; the counterfactual was no default MIF with settlement at par; there would be no bilaterally agreed interchange fees in the counterfactual; and in the counterfactual the MSC would be lower because it would be determined by competition. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
"The court has a fiduciary responsibility as guardians of the rights of the absentee class members when deciding whether to approve a settlement agreement. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:14 pm
Moreover, since the quantification of hours in almost any off-the-clock case is usually subject to bona fide disputes, this tactic would also seem easily available in any off-the-clock cases. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 7:02 pm
In its White Paper on damages actions, the EC stated that it intended to draw up a framework with pragmatic, non-binding guidance for the quantification of damages in antitrust cases. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:31 pm
In its White Paper on damages actions, the EC stated that it intended to draw up a framework with pragmatic, non-binding guidance for the quantification of damages in antitrust cases. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:01 am
” The letters estimated the recipients’ liabilities at “over $100,000” but stated that Outlaw would “settle all claims in exchange for a one-time settlement agreement of [$9,765, in the sample demand letter] and your agreement to stop selling the Illicit Products. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:12 am
A further hearing is expected to determine the quantification of damages. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:12 am
A further hearing is expected to determine the quantification of damages. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:56 am
The letter finally required the parties to enter into a confidential settlement agreement and release. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 8:02 pm
But the quantification order was sofavorable that even Scruggs’s attorneys worried that it could not be affirmed on appeal, so Scruggs settled the Wilson Case before appeal with the help of DeLaughter, who revealed Wilson’s confidential settlement position. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
Finally, in 2008, DWR approved the settlement agreement and certified the EIR. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
NOTE: The Supreme Court granted review in this case. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:40 am
The range of dispute was narrow and the interim injunction decision substantially foreshadowed the ultimate settlement. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
The fact that a party rejects a settlement offer can be taken into account at the end of the case when a decision is made as to cost. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
The California Supreme Court has granted review of this case. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm
It was only at that point that he became entitled to the benefit of the term implied into the tenancy agreement by s.11 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:31 pm
RS 23:1271 Right of parties to settle or compromise RS 23:1272 Approval of lump sum or compromise settlements by the workers' compensation judge RS 23:1273 Repealed by acts 1988, no. 938, 3, eff. jan. 1, 1990. [read post]
