Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 101 - 120 of 4,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
., Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2017660723/)Today's trainee solicitors do not know the heart racing feat of yesteryear of trying to navigate the maze of the Royal Courts of Justice to find the (then) Queen's Bench Division (QBD) Fee Office to pay the Claim Form Fee (by cheque) by 4PM, to then hauling it to the Issuing desk before 4:30PM to issue a Claim Form. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
" For even if they found in her favor on the first two grounds, she would still end up losing the case, given that she didn’t challenge the Supreme Court’s merits determinationA dollar for your thoughts there ….# # #DECISIOND. v Family Dollar Stores of N.Y., Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONChickery v Prestige Catering, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”Given those unrebutted facts, the AD2 thought the court below had correctly decided in CC favor’s and it left the liability finding undisturbed.Guess those defendants will now have to roll over ….# # #C. v 455 Ocean Assoc., LLC [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”Given that the hole was “open and obvious,” the AD2 affirmed the outcome and allowed the dismissal to stand.Guess Balgley was left holding the bag there.# # #Balgley v City of New York [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
Other EU Member State courts have shown a similar understanding not only with regard to exclusive jurisdiction agreements but also with regard to arbitration agreements (Austrian Supreme Court of Justice; High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:32 am
August 3, 2023 - 1 PM: Mealpass, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
” (CPLR 302 [a] [1]; Aybar v US Tires & Wheels of Queens, LLC, 211 Ad 3d 40, 48-49 [2d Dept 2022].) [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 10:26 am by Aleksandra Czubek
 William Patry, a copyright legend and, as per his article, an IPKat fan too, discussed the Supreme Court's Warhol v. [read post]