Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
The language used by Congress in Section 702 directs the FISC to satisfy itself that these targeting, minimization, and querying procedures are “consistent with [Section 702] and with the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:21 am
There are no laws against false speech in general, nor can there be, since the Supreme Court declared such speech was protected in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:39 am
Evelyn Douek, Assistant Professor of Law(Originally published by Stanford News on October 7, 2022) On the docket for the United States Supreme Court this term is Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:57 am
You can find the two court filings below.United States et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 11:20 am
Private Foundations & Unrelated Business Income Taxes & International Philanthropy International: See Treasury Implements Historic Humanitarian Sanctions Exceptions “The general licenses released today reflect the United States’ commitment to ensuring that humanitarian assistance and related trade continues to reach at-risk populations through legitimate and transparent channels, while maintaining the effective use of targeted sanctions, which remain an… [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
[i] V. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
” And they reaffirmed the positive and negative security assurances to all non-nuclear states under the NPT previously made by nuclear powers, including Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The Court had held in 1909 that people who were employed by or received pensions from the United States couldn’t serve as jurors in federal criminal cases. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
On February 17, Counselor to the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Jeffrey Minear interviewed Associate Justice Stephen Breyer on his book, “The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:46 pm
However, in two recent decisions, the United States Supreme Court cast doubt on whether Blaine Amendments can be reconciled with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 12:29 am
Some conclusions are drawn in Part V. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm
When Prelogar responded that they would not, Roberts reminded her of the court’s recent decision in Biden v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
Joshi replies that the court’s precedent has suggested as much in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
Arguments of the United States Assistant to the Solicitor General Benjamin Snyder argued for the United States in support of neither party. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm
And the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in Morton v. [read post]
