Search for: "Query v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm by India McKinney
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm by India McKinney
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am by Josh Blackman
” I think the answer is exactly what Trump said it meant: keeping terrorists out of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:32 am by Wells Bennett
The latest statement from the defense in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:01 am by George Croner
Targeting, however, is constrained by specific limitations included by Congress that prohibit targeting anyone known to be in the United States; prohibit targeting any U.S. person located outside the United States; prohibit targeting someone outside the United States for the purpose of targeting a particular, known person in this country; prohibit the intentional acquisition of any communication where all participants are located in the… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
The `unknown’ query return was the only basis for the traffic stop. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:26 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:39 am by Melissa De Witte
Evelyn Douek, Assistant Professor of Law(Originally published by Stanford News on October 7, 2022) On the docket for the United States Supreme Court this term is Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm by Mark Rumold
But we’ll never convince judges or elected officials to respect the privacy rights of those outside the United States if we can’t convince them that Americans’ privacy is worth protecting, too. [read post]