Search for: "Quillen, Appeal of"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2008, 7:10 am
Quillen, Ogden D. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
Quillen v. [read post]
10 May 2008, 6:06 pm
Quillen and Webster's "97% patent grant rate" number was a scam all along. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:33 pm
This also sort of reminds one of how some patent reformers cited to Quillen and Webster for a 97% patent grant rate, even though no such thing was in Quillen and Webster. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
IPBiz notes that there was no appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:43 am
RGJ 10/25/07 County's Quillen to quit. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 11:24 pm
Commentary by Vindu Goel of the San Jose Mercury-News on patent reform was savaged by commenters.Goel parrots Jaffe and Lerner: Unfortunately, the system is broken, threatening the valley's magic formula, which is based on combining old and new ideas into something that no one ever thought of before.Goel parrots Quillen and Webster: inexperienced examiners at the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:21 pm
Quillen and O. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Innova/PureWater, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 10:57 pm
***As a footnote related to the IPFrontline text There has been much discussion in academic circles about the failure of the court to consider law review articles in their deliberations.Within footnote 41 of the second Quillen paper (12 Fed. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 6:15 pm
A growing backlog at the Patent Board of Appeals is inevitable.IPBiz suspects the same bogus elevated patent grant rates will appear before the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
The Dreyfuss article did not mention the patent quality discussion of Quillen and Webster, although Jaffe and Lerner did refer to the Quillen and Webster thinking within Chapter 5 (page 142). [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
., the 95% and 97% of Quillen and Webster) are corrected numbers, as is the 75% number of Clarke. [read post]
