Search for: "Quinn v. American Express Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities.[1] He is also an adjunct professor at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Billing, 551 U.S. 264, 276 (2007); American Express Company v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
Baltimore first sued the oil companies in a Maryland state court alleging that the companies concealed the dangerous climate impacts of fossil fuels. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Some asked how Twitter will deal with companies who are politically active. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
Henry v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” Watkins v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
The FTC's case was validated by testimony from the industry at large (American companies, companies from ally nations, and others). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Last summer, tech companies followed suit, with CEOs including Elon Musk signing an Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Chemical Weapons. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Like insurance companies, homeowners’ associations and utility companies, unions pool money contributed by many stakeholders and spend it to provide services and to engage in expressive activity. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Christopher Tayback, Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, Oliver & Hedges, Los Angeles, California, for amicus National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
But amidst the intense focus on Reno v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
See The Fredericksburg Care Company L.P. v Juanita Perez et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:11 am
But I’m not here to express a point of view – political, economic, or otherwise. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
In the case of Harris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Anonymous and company couldn’t have done it better themselves. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Per a study by American Express, 39 percent of younger workers won’t even consider working for a company that blocks Facebook. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Adams, William Bryan "Bill" v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Title: Rast v. [read post]
