Search for: "Quinn v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 3:50 am
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights; bankruptcy case Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Sullivan, Partner, Quinn Emanuel Seth P. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
The case of Harris v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:12 am
Quinn, a case that could upend agreements with state governments that allow taxpayer-funded home-care workers to unionize.Those deals have helped boost public sector unions in several states at a time when overall union membership is declining. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Twitter v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:21 pm
Crain v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
See Whitlock v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:03 pm
Quinn, a case in which the plaintiffs argue that Olmstead forbids the State of Illinois from closing institutions for people with developmental disabilities. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:42 am
Coakley (Mark Rienzi), and the lawyer for the state of Illinois (who was defending the state’s mandatory union dues program) in Harris v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 3:58 am
As stated in Ford v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
The Winter 2009 edition of “Alternative Resolutions” features the following articles: Arbitration Empirical Studies The San Antonio Court of Appeals: A Substantively Unconscionable Provision in an Arbitration Agreement Should Have Been Severed, Allowing Compulsory Arbitration to Go Forward Hall Street Applied To Texas General Arbitration Act In Quinn v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Quinn (each opinion downloads as a pdf). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
Quinn. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
LEXIS 8142 (TX App., Aug. 4, 2015), a Texas state appeals court in a 2-1 decision affirmed the dismissal on statute of limitations grounds of a suit by an inmate who is a member of the House of Yahweh who was refused kosher meals.In Quinn v. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 9:34 pm
If the NC game were played next week, it should feature Ohio State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:02 am
Quinn and NLRB v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:42 pm
Quinn. [read post]
