Search for: "Quinn v. State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Sabraw of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California entered an order after which Qualcomm and Quinn Emanuel should be ashamed for the procedural shenanigans with which they obtained an injunction in Germany that appears to be absolutely baseless. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
No matter what Qualcomm will say (and Quinn Emanuel's Dr. [read post]
Patent office and Qualcomm's litigation tactics render prof's fanboy testimony on patents unreliable
23 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
The combination of two Apple v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
Quinn did affirm the district court’s decision to disregard primary election procedures embodied in state law, but only in order to comply with the legislature’s prescribed date for the replacement election in the Illinois Election Code; thus, one way to read the case is as saying that if something in state law had to give (both under state law and as required by the Seventeenth Amendment), it should be the primary system, not the legislatively… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am
Qualcomm; Southern District of California: Apple and contract manufacturers v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:09 am
It's in stark contrast to what the firm's founder, John Quinn, told Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California at a 2014 Apple v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Wade, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, October 17, 2018 Tags: Broker-dealers, DTC, Ownership, Public firms, Securities litigation, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder voting Mandated Gender Diversity for California Boards Posted by Howard Dicker, Lyuba Goltser and Erika Kaneko, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Thursday, October 18, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Boards of… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Thus the appeal in Janus v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
In its 2014 decision Harris v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
In its 2014 decision Harris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am
State Bar of California by relying entirely on Abood in setting the constitutional limits on mandatory bar fees. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:35 am
In 2015 in Harris v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:28 am
Zigann's question about the state of settlement discussions. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
BlackBerry afraid of transfer of its trollish patent lawsuit against Facebook to Northern California
7 Mar 2018, 4:46 am
The following year, the Supreme Court's famous eBay v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:35 pm
The California Supreme Court easily dismissed his case in DeMille v. [read post]
