Search for: "Quinn v. Stein" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a question of fact as to whether the continuous representation doctrine tolled the running of the statute of limitations (see Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d 1085, 1087). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a question of fact as to whether the continuous representation doctrine tolled the statute of limitations as to this action (see Grace v Law, 24 NY3d 203, 212; Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789-790; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d 1085, 1086; cf. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Charles O'Mahony
Day 1 On day one of the Summer School Professor Gerard Quinn and Professor Michael Stein introduced the curriculum of the Summer School to the participants. [read post]