Search for: "Quinones v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2008, 8:34 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:18 am
United States, 2009 D.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
§§5316(a) (1) (A) (Reports on exporting and importing monetary instruments); 5332 (a) & (b) (Bulk cash smuggling into or out of the United States); and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:48 am
As Wikipedia notes, until the “1960s, mens rea in the United States was a very slippery, vague, and confused concept” because it was based on common law. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 9:19 pm
Barcelo III, Substantive and Procedural Arbitrability in Ad Hoc Investor-State Arbitration — BG Group v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
In 2002, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Connell cross-applies his analysis of Quinones to the ripeness of this issue and notes that additionally, a 2003 district court found in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:03 pm
” State ex rel Healey v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:34 am
Quinones Alejandro presided. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In his decision in Harvey v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:47 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
The "additional matters" were: (1) United States v. [read post]
