Search for: "R "
Results 321 - 340
of 1,070,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2019, 2:15 am
Ein Beispiel dafür ist eine Abmahnung, die Anwaltskollege Dr. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:24 am
R v Stewart [2009] EWCA Crim 593; [ 2009] WLR (D) 244 “A jury in a murder trial considering the defence of diminished responsibility by a defendant suffering from alcohol dependency syndrome should not be directed to look at each drink consumed prior to the killing and decide whether it was taken voluntarily or involuntarily since, [...] [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:19 pm
Same enigmatic smile, slightly greyer hair Today's Throwback Thursday focuses on Kevin R. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:24 am
R v Downer [2009] EWCA Crim 1361; [2009] WLR (D) 233 “The offence of aggravated burglary under s 10 (1) of the Theft Act 1968 was not to be regarded as an indivisible offence and, in order to find out what constituted a burglary, it was essential to have regard to the two types of burglary [...] [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
R v Kousar [2008]; [2009] WLR (D) 16 “A wife who shared the matrimonial home with her husband, whom she knew was storing merchandise from his business at home, but acquiesced in it being there and did not demand he remove it, was not in control or possession of the goods within the meaning of s [...] [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:35 am
Saving the Canary by Jeremy R. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:34 pm
The DePaul College of Law's International Aviation Law Institute will be hosting John R. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:09 am
But it seems to me we invariably react in one of three ways to the Read more » The post Arraignment, R. 3:9-1 appeared first on SMOLENSKY LAW - NJ CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER | Call Now! [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Trusts & Estates recently interviewed Christopher R. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:59 am
R v Greene “Where a judge ruled that a witness could be treated as a hostile in examination at trial within the meaning of s 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1865 by the party calling him, but that witness did not in the event prove to be hostile, the judge was still obliged to warn [...] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:36 am
R v Islam [2009] UKHL 30; [2009] WLR (D) 177 “When assessing the ‘market value’ of goods for the purposes of making a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the court was not restricted to looking at the value of the goods in a legitimate market but was required to look at the [...] [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
R v Tilley [2009] EWCA Crim 1426; [2009] WLR (D) 249 “Where a third party knew of a change that affected the benefit of a person claiming income support, he would be guilty of an offence if he dishonestly allowed the beneficiary to fail to report the change, but to commit the offence the third party [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:20 am
R v Winters:[2008] EWCA Crim 2953; [2008] WLR (D) 387 “For the purpose of making the required assumptions in relation to determining whether the defendant had benefited from drug trafficking, the Crown was required to prove on the balance of probabilities that expenditure on mortgage payments was incurred by the defendant out of payments received by [...] [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
En guise de résumé, la Chambre indique ce qui suit : Quand une description inclut des références à des Figures numérotées et que des Figures ayant les mêmes numéros sont déposées en même temps, des Figures différentes peuvent néanmoins être déposées plus tard en vertu de la R.56 CBE en tant que "Figures manquantes" s'il peut être établi sans… [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:54 am
In 2019, the industry spent $83 billion on R&D. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:35 am
The results show that countries with lower entry cost and better intellectual property rights protection tend to invest more in R&D, especially in industries with high natural entry rate and high R&D intensity. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:23 am
R v Ahmed; [2010] WLR (D) 219 “The act of procuring the miscarriage of a woman’s child did not, by itself, amount to an offence known to English law. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:28 am
R v Rochford; [2010] WLR (D) 220 “A failure by a defendant to comply with the requirements of ss 5(5) and 6A of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 to provide a defence statement containing the general nature of his defence, did not constitute a contempt of court and was only punishable with sanctions specified in s 11 of the 1996 Act, of a court or other party being permitted to make comment on that failure, or the court or jury being permitted to drawing inferences as… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
Der Bundesrat hat gestern beschlossen, den eidgenössischen Räten den Entwurf eines Bundesgesetzes über die Rückerstattung unrechtmässig erworbener Vermögenswerte politisch exponierter Personen (RuVG) zu unterbreiten.Aus der Medienmitteilung des Eidgenössischen Departements für auswärtige Angelegenheiten (EDA):Dieser Gesetzesentwurf regelt die Sperrung, Einziehung und Rückerstattung von Vermögenswerten… [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:41 am
R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 1900; [2008] WLR (D) 294 “A person called to the Bar who had not found a place in chambers but fell within para 206.1 of the Code of Conduct was not thereby ‘authorised’ by the Bar Council to practise as a member of the profession whose members the Bar Council regulated for purposes of s 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999; accordingly he was apt to be prosecuted for providing immigration advice or immigration services contrary to… [read post]
