Search for: "R. (S.) VS. N. (J.), ET AL."
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm
In its decision in the case of Mertzig et al. vs. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:57 am
- Sylvain SÉNÉCAL (HEC Montréal)Que veut dire la neutralité technologique ? [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:57 am
- Sylvain SÉNÉCAL (HEC Montréal)Que veut dire la neutralité technologique ? [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:27 am
[et. al.] [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
WHITE, J., presentó una opinión disidente, [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Oliver et al (2008) published a comprehensive review of developments and future outlooks for pre-harvest food safety this month. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Le transport de grandes quantités d'alcool et la vente de bière sont en revanche soumis à la règlementation et aux droits de douanes. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:57 am
- Sylvain SÉNÉCAL (HEC Montréal)Que veut dire la neutralité technologique ? [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
Several authors have conducted extensive surveys of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank raw milk (BTM) and the dairy environment (Hancock et al 1998; Jayarao et al, 2006; LeJeune et al, 2009; Oliver et al, 2005; Oliver et al, 2005; Shere et al, 1998). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, Barry et al.(1990); Hochberg (2012), Celikyurt et al. (2014), and Iliev and Lowry (2020) show that venture capitalists maintain board influence well beyond a firm’s IPO. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
After an average 12-year follow-up period, no differences were observed in the rates of sexual (21.1% vs 21.8%), violent (42.9% vs. 44.5%) or general (any) recidivism (56.6% vs 60.4%) for treated and untreated groups, respectively. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
HILL, JR. vs. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
R. (1997). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Superior Essex Inc. et al. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Seagate Technology et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
OCs vs. 2nd gen. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
HUGHES, an individual; and J. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Those elements motivate core differences in the Court’s interpretive debates over fundamental privileges versus promises, textualism versus purposivism, status quo-preserving originalism vs. rights-promoting pragmatism.[4] I aim to explore those elements with an eye to the plurality of opinions that emerge from shared legal texts, now that stare decisis is in question as a way to settle them and now that interpretations of history and tradition matter a lot toward the same… [read post]
