Search for: "R. S. et al v. Target Corporation" Results 81 - 100 of 216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While financial fraud has always been an important enforcement target for the SEC, the agency recently has shown increased attention to financial reporting cases. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:14 am
District Court for the Northern District of California:  Craigslist, Inc. v. 3taps, Inc., et al., 2015 WL 5921212 (2015). [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Some insider trading cases are straightforward, such as when a corporate executive trades stock in his or her company before the company’s earnings announcement. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
Rep. 6. [3] Id. at 7, 11. [4] Id. at 7. [5] Stephen Choi, et al., Cornerstone Research and New York University Pollack Center for Law & Business, SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Fiscal Year 2017 Update 3 (2017). [6] Id. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
Rep. 6. [3] Id. at 7, 11. [4] Id. at 7. [5] Stephen Choi, et al., Cornerstone Research and New York University Pollack Center for Law & Business, SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Fiscal Year 2017 Update 3 (2017). [6] Id. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm by Barry Sookman
Target Corporation, 2015 QCCA 1809 PIPEDA Amendments in S-4 John Stevens v Glennis Walsh, 2016 ONSC 2418 Chandra v CBC, 2015 ONSC 5303 John Doe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Target (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) Claim amendments in reexamination eliminate patentee’s right to past damages: District Court C D California – Antonious v. [read post]