Search for: "R.C."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 8:12 am
") and her brother-in-law ("R.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:00 pm
" --Legal Insurrection follower R.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:23 am
Eduardo R.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 4:16 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that when both a videotape of the proceedings and a certified written transcript of a criminal trial are filed in a court of appeals, it is the filing of the certified written transcript that triggers the running of the 180-day time limit for the defendant to file a petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.21(A)(2). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:08 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that a provision in the state’s disorderly conduct statute, R.C. 2917.11(A)(2), that prohibits “recklessly causing inconvenience, annoyance or alarm to another by ... making excessive noise” provides sufficient notice for a person of ordinary intelligence to understand what the law requires, and therefore is not unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 7:10 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled 7-0 today that pursuant to R.C. 1343.02, when a debtor defaults on a written instrument that specifies an interest rate payable on the unpaid balance, and there is no agreement of the parties or another statutory provision expressly authorizing the compounding of interest, the creditor is entitled to simple interest on the unpaid amount until payment is made. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 11:00 am
The New 1L: First-Year Lawyering with Clients (Eduardo R.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 4:09 pm
In a decision announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio recognized a limited exception to the general rule that a terminated employee must notify his employer of his intent to file a retaliatory discharge lawsuit under R.C. 4123.90 within 90 days after the date of the employee’s termination. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
The web page of the Ohio Supreme Court reports: The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that a corporation cannot avoid its duty under R.C. 1701.13(E)(5)(a) to advance the legal defense expenses of a corporate director who is sued in... [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:53 am
In 2009, M.D. applied to have his convictions expunged pursuant to R.C. 2953.32. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:21 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio today ruled 6-1 that because aggravation of a preexisting medical condition is a type of causation, it is not a separate condition or distinct injury as defined in R.C. 4123.01 and a workers’ compensation claimant can present evidence on any theory of causation pertinent to a claim for a medical condition that already has been addressed administratively. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
From the web page of the Ohio Supreme Court: The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that a provision in the state’s disorderly conduct statute, R.C. 2917.11(A)(2), that prohibits “recklessly causing inconvenience, annoyance or alarm to another by ... making... [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:04 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that an exception to the community notification requirement for Tier III sex offenders set forth in current R.C. 2950.11(B)(2) applies to offenders who were first notified of their classification after Am Sub. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:31 am
Scott has filed an affidavit pursuant to R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Terri Jamison from the above-referenced child-custody and child-support... [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:50 am
In The New 1L: First-Year Lawyering with Clients edited by Eduardo R.C. [read post]
Intent to Use Item to Violate Federal Law Qualifies as Intent to Use 'Criminally' Under Ohio Statute
16 Dec 2010, 7:14 pm
In a decision announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that possession of an item with a purpose to use it to violate a federal law is sufficient to support a finding that a defendant intended to use that item “criminally” in violation of R.C. 2923.24(A), Ohio’s “criminal tools” statute. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:03 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that in juvenile cases, if the state fails to exercise its right to pursue an interlocutory appeal (an appeal prior to entry of final judgment) of an adverse ruling by the trial court, and the defendant is subsequently acquitted, the state has no right to pursue a post-acquittal appeal of that ruling under R.C. 2945.67. [read post]
Township Trustees Are Not 'Party' With Legal Standing to File Mandamus Action Challenging Annexation
30 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
In a decision announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that by filing objections with county commissioners to an annexation petition pursuant to R.C. 709.023(D), a board of township trustees does not gain legal standing to later file a mandamus action challenging the commissioners’ approval of the requested annexation. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that R.C. 4123.90, a state law that prohibits the firing of workers in retaliation for filing workers’ compensation claims, expresses a clear public policy against the retaliatory firing of injured employees, including those who are fired before filing a workers’ compensation claim. [read post]
8 May 2010, 1:05 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that when the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit asserts both asbestos-related and non-asbestos-related claims in the same tort action, the non-asbestos claims may be severed and proceed to trial immediately even though the asbestos-related claims are administratively dismissed under R.C. 2307.93. [read post]
