Search for: "RANDALL JONES v. THE STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
Randall President Trump Violated the First Amendment by Blocking Users @realdonaldtrump Kentucky Governor Can Block Constituents on Social Media–Morgan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
United States as a case that is “likely to be the Term’s most important federal sentencing case, and its second-most important immigration case after United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
Bolton 410 U.S. 179 (1973)(upholding right to abortion)25th anniversary:Bob Jones University v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am by James Eckert
The Court of Appeals decided two CPW cases today.In People v Jones (#185 decided 11/19/13), defendant was charged with CPW2 for possessing a weapon in his home, having been previously convicted of a crime. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by R. David Donoghue
Goldstein of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and publisher of SCOTUSblog; Deborah Jones Merritt, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law at Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University (court-appointed amicus in Reed Elsevier); Jeffrey M. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am by Nabiha Syed
Maya Jackson Randall of Dow Jones Newswires (via NASDAQ) covers the Court’s refusal to review Bank of New York Mellon Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:41 pm
McGreal, 87 F.3d 1252, 1254 (11th Cir. 1996) (quoting Jones v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on King v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:06 am
Randall Jones, No. 95,654 (Mitchell)Direct appeal; manufactureRandall L. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:02 pm by Diversity Insight
Because Jones is an employee of a state institution, her actions were considered “under the color of state law. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, as well as the grant in Buck v. [read post]