Search for: "READES V COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 11:29 am
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court released its decision this morning in Robinson Township et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On January 19, 2011, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued an Opinion in the case of Brown v. [read post]
Commonwealth, et al., the court clarified the issue of what constitutes sufficient evidence for charging an individual of driving under the influence of alcohol within the framework of Pennsylvania DUI law. [read post]
Commonwealth, et al., the court clarified the issue of what constitutes sufficient evidence for charging an individual of driving under the influence of alcohol within the framework of Pennsylvania DUI law. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:25 am by Gail Whittemore
Related Reading: Greg Stohr, Pennsylvania Republicans Rejected by Supreme Court on Voting Map, U.S. [read post]
Commonwealth et al., the suspect’s operating privileges were suspended for one year due to her refusal to submit to chemical testing following her arrest for suspicion of DUI. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:45 am by Charles Sartain
Allegheny Township Zoning Hearing Board, et al, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed a local zoning ordinance allowing oil and gas operations in all zoning districts in the Township as long as they satisfied enumerated standards that were designed to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizenry. [read post]
Commonwealth et al., the suspect’s operating privileges were suspended for one year due to her refusal to submit to chemical testing following her arrest for suspicion of DUI. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Bd. of Sup. of Fairfield Twp., et al., No. 67 MAP 2016, 2018 WL 2448803 (June 1, 2018). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:21 am by Aaron Weems
Windsor, et al. which upheld the invalidation of the operative portion of the federal Defense of Marriage Act; the Commonwealth is actually citing that case as proof that states have the right to legislatively define marriage as they deem fit. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:50 pm by David Garcia and Melissa Gertler
nl_pk=44e1cfe8-1d78-4c79-ab63-b190fb389cc8&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=competition. [3] FTC et al. v. [read post]