Search for: "RECKITT BENCKISER INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
., Serial No.86051465 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below, for various men's clothing items, in view of the registered mark RED SEAL for "Carry-all bags, leather pouches, rucksacks, duffle bags, travel bags, tool bags sold empty, backpacks, purses, trunks, suitcases, garment bags for travel, billfolds, wallets, harnesses, leather bags, leather bag laces, valises"].September 22, 2015 - 11 AM: Mini Melts, Inc. v Reckitt Benckiser LLC , Opposition No.… [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:32 pm
Reckitt Benckiser? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:32 pm
Reckitt Benckiser? [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:07 am
The organization recommended that several companies modify or discontinue claims made for the following consumer products: Disinfecting Wipes After a challenge by The Clorox Company, NAD recommended that Reckitt Benckiser, Inc., discontinue certain claims made in both print and television ads for Lysol Disinfecting Wipes and Spray products. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
In Reckitt Benckiser Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
A copy of the Complaint is available here.Finally, not sure really how to introduce this one, but Absorption Pharmaceuticals has claimed that Reckitt Benckiser, the maker of, um, K-Y lubricants, stole its trade secrets on a sexual performance enhancer. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
The key issue before NAD was whether Reckitt Benckiser’s claims drew a comparison between a broader line of Procter & Gamble’s products or only a liquid gel to liquid gel comparison. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm
Reckitt Benckiser has agreed to modify is advertisement to address the NAD’s concerns. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm
Reckitt Benckiser has agreed to modify is advertisement to address the NAD’s concerns. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:55 am
Reckitt Benckiser LLC, 118 USPQ2d 1464, 1470 (TTAB 2016). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:07 am
Reckitt Benckiser agreed to discontinue the challenged advertisements. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 7:53 pm
Reckitt Benckiser LLC, 118 USPQ2d 1464 (TTAB 2016) [precedential]. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 7:53 pm
Reckitt Benckiser LLC, 118 USPQ2d 1464 (TTAB 2016) [precedential]. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:19 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Austin & Anor v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] EWCA Civ 989 (15 October 2007) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 968 (10 October 2007) Holmes-Moorhouse v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2007] EWCA Civ 970 (10 October 2007) Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936 (10 October 2007) Charman v Orion Group Publishing Group Ltd… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
Reckitt — Multiple whistleblowers received awards from the $700 million Reckitt Benckiser Group plc paid to resolve allegations it violated the False Claims Act relating to its marketing and sale of its opioid addiction treatment drug Suboxone (through its then-subsidiary Indivior Inc.). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
Reckitt — Multiple whistleblowers received awards from the $700 million Reckitt Benckiser Group plc paid to resolve allegations it violated the False Claims Act relating to its marketing and sale of its opioid addiction treatment drug Suboxone (through its then-subsidiary Indivior Inc.). [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 10:24 am
Here are the top ten healthcare recoveries of 2019 by the numbers: Reckitt Benckiser – In July 2019, DOJ, the Federal Trade Commission, and three states (VA, NY, PA) announced a $1.4 billion global settlement of criminal, civil, and administrative claims against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC and its former subsidiary Indivior Inc. regarding allegations that the defendants engaged in deceptive marketing of Suboxone, a drug used to treat opioid… [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
It is difficult to see how this inherent prejudice can be eliminated from design cases dealing with line drawings, which may account for some of the surprising decisions we have seen in the past, for example in Procter & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA 936 (Ch) [noted on the IPKat weblog here]. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:05 am
(PatLit) Levaquin (Levofloxacin) – US: CAFC awards only partial costs where depositions used in multiple cases from different district courts: Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:25 am
Not only that, but they were not present in the Kiddee Case (you can see that the tiger has the same colour all over its body).On this point, Kitchin LJ referred to Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2006] EWHC 3145 (Ch). [read post]
