Search for: "REDDING v. REDDING"
Results 61 - 80
of 8,496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2014, 10:59 pm
When getting your wings might give you trouble from the one that gives you wings: Looks like Red Bull — owner of federally-registered rights in Gives You Wings — is considering a trademark opposition to prevent registration of Get Your Wings by Victoria’s Secret. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:35 am
Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:35 am
Equal pay for equal work and “red lined” positions Fenton v St. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:18 am
On September 22, the Texas Supreme Court refused to reconsider its opinion in BP America v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:43 pm
It is therefore with great relief that the IPKat publishes the following note by Stephen Vousden: "Red Bull makes the 'Red Bull' energy-drink. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
Does the Supreme Court’s decision in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:48 pm
ON RED LIGHT CAMERAS .......Today, in Courtroom 2-11, beginning at 10:30 AM, Associate Administrative Judge Steve Leifman will begin a two day hearing, (currently scheduled to continue on Tuesday, June 16th at 10:00 AM), on the issue of Whether Red Light Camera tickets can be prosecuted in Miami-Dade County.In the case of City of Hollywood v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:48 am
District Court’s December 28, 2009 judgment in favor of the American Bar Association in American Bar Association v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 10:55 am
Here are the materials in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:54 am
Here is the opinion in Scalia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
The unanimous decision in the case, known as The People of California v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:06 am
Krasnyi Oktyabr, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
First, the Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was said, in the important ruling in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent 29-30- that:‘We conclude, based on the record before us, that Louboutin has not established secondary meaning in an application of a red sole to a red shoe, but only where the red sole contrasts with the “upper” of the shoe. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:34 pm
J. ___ (2024) Gregory v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:19 pm
Red Box rebutted, asserting that all claims were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Stella v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 2:54 am
In Hall v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:11 am
The court held that the 4th amendment rights of 13 year old student Savana Redding were violated when she was subjected to a strip search at school. [read post]
