Search for: "REITER v REITER"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 9:12 am
In Swamy v Singh, the Supreme Court has reiterated that the 3 month time limit imposed on the grant of governmental sanction under section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 for prosecution of public servants for corruption must be strictly adhered to. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- On the brink of oral argument before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, it may be helpful to reiterate (as do the parties) the arguments from Petitioner Farmer Bowman and Respondent Monsanto, Inc. in Bowman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
” In Velazco v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:40 am
O'Brien In Solana v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:15 am
This explanation of the State Street test would be in accord with both the Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski, as well as in Alice v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 12:00 pm
Casale v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:57 pm
While this seems a reiteration of an accepted principle of corporate law, it assumes greater significance in light of the ongoing Hutch-Vodafone tax dispute, where the central question is whether the transfer of the shareholding of a company having assets in India amounts to transfer of those assets situated in India. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce reiterated and expanded upon its earlier objections that the rule would greatly burden companies and auditors. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:56 pm
The plaintiffs, the Court reiterated, were not residents of California. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:52 pm
Andre In Futrell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 11:04 am
One may recall that this is the third time the Supreme Court has reiterated this need for speedy disposal of IPR cases, the two earlier instances being the Bajaj v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
" In Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
" In Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 1:47 pm
By Eric Goldman Doe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:18 pm
In so doing, the Federal Circuit reiterated the holding of the Supreme Court in Microsoft v. i4i that, because issued patents enjoy a presumption of validity, the burden of proof for a challenger is clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:04 pm
Woolums v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
In Sisemore v. [read post]
