Search for: "REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
Federal Election Commission, et al. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
Federal Election Commission, et al. (091287). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:55 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Republican National Committee is pursuing exactly that argument in a case that the Justices are scheduled to consider at their private Conference on June 24 — Republican National Committee, et al., v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:52 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Earlier this week the Republican National Committee filed its brief in McCutcheon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
At issue in the case of Republican National Committee, et al., v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
In the ongoing series of lawsuits regarding a proposed off-shore wind power generation facility in Nantucket Sound, Plaintiffs, the Town of Barnstable and Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, et al sought an injunction against Massachusetts, et al regarding the Cape Wind facility     The district court granted defendants' motions to dismiss after determining that the Eleventh Amendment precluded… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Their petition (Cao, et al., v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 Trump himself offers the Court at least three such “off-ramps,” and the respondent Colorado Republican State Central Committee (CRSCC) proposes two others. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Federal Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the National Organization Of Veterans’ Advocates, Inc. et al. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
” In 2003, in the case of McConnell, et al., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
Bennett, et al. (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]