Search for: "RICE v. HOLDER et al"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am
Friedenberg et al., 2019-0416. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
., et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Castaneda et al. ; Henneford v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Superior Essex Inc. et al. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Prince et al, 784 F.Supp.2d 337 (S.D. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Holder, 09-89). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Rice, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
