Search for: "RICHARD SEEBORG, and as an individual" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2011, 2:27 pm by Mike
 Judge Seeborg disagreed and granted the plaintiffs conditional class certification. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here (scroll down), in January 2011, Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg found Oracle’s forum selection by-law to be unenforceable, in part because it had not been put to shareholder vote. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:33 pm by Mike
Judge Richard Seeborg dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 10:38 pm by Mike
  Judge Richard Seeborg, evaluating the case on an initial screening under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm by Mike
  It is seeking discovery of the identity of the owners of the IP addresses that downloaded the content so that it can substitute those individuals for the Doe defendants currently listed in the lawsuit. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the Northern District of California, Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that:   [T]he crux of the inquiry for the reliance element is whether each investor relied on Schwab’s alleged misrepresentations and omissions when conducting each particular trade. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
The article neglects to mention that just last week Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg held that the forum selection clause in Oracle’s bylaws is unenforceable. [read post]