Search for: "RN v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
  It was the Magnitone that preoccupied three days of Patents Court time before Mr Justice Carr this past December and which was subject to the recent decision of L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
  Carr J stated in respect of this argument he would have concluded that the "shear variant" produced substantially the same result in the same way and obviously so as the patent states it is the preferred arrangement. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
., MA Two RNs successfully obtained certification of a class of RNs who provided direct patient care in short term acute care facilities while employed by eight Detroit area hospitals from December 12, 2002, through the present by demonstrating predominance and superiority (Cason-Merenda v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
., MA Two RNs successfully obtained certification of a class of RNs who provided direct patient care in short term acute care facilities while employed by eight Detroit area hospitals from December 12, 2002, through the present by demonstrating predominance and superiority (Cason-Merenda v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
., MA Two RNs successfully obtained certification of a class of RNs who provided direct patient care in short term acute care facilities while employed by eight Detroit area hospitals from December 12, 2002, through the present by demonstrating predominance and superiority (Cason-Merenda v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:16 pm by Cyber Lawyer
  The United States Department of Justice had alleged that Adil Cassim was the leader of Rabid Neurosis ("RNS"). [read post]
20 May 2008, 8:48 pm
This one from the 9th Circuit in Washington State Nurses Association v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Whatever thе rеаѕоn, you аrе now thrеаtеnеd wіth аn Intеrnаl Rеvеnuе Service (IRS) wage gаrnіѕhmеnt or state tax levy. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Lisa Girdwood, Brodies LLP
The Supreme Court, in the case of AR v RN (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 35 has confirmed that habitual residence is a question of fact rather than legal construct. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
Contents include:Indigene Völker und Vereinte NationenAsbjørn Eide, United Nations standard-setting regarding rights of minorities and indigenous peoples Dan Kuwali & Gudmundur Alfredsson, The Responsibility to Protect Minorities: The Question of Protection by Kin-States Alexandra Xanthaki, Indigenous rights at the United Nations: Their impact on international human rights standards Ulrike Haider-Quercia, Minderheitenschutz und Gleichheitsgebot im Wahlrecht… [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In determining habitual residence, it stated that the focus is upon the situation of the child; the intentions of the parents being merely one of the relevant factors. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:06 pm
Supreme Court Takes Up Child Porn CaseChildren of the Porn: The Supreme Court contemplates lying about porn in the real worldSentencing Law & PolicyCriminal porn and punishments today at the Supreme CourtTalkLeftSupreme Court Arguments on Child P*RN LawVolokh ConspiracyWilliams Transcript [read post]